Presidential Debate: Myth of Amoral Lawmaking

Last night’s presidential debate helped to further show the stark contrast between the two candidates running for America’s highest office. Although both President Bush and Senator Kerry talked about their faith, it was interesting to note how they believe their faith should assume different roles in policy decision-making. John Kerry stated plainly that: “The President and I have a difference of opinion about how we live out our sense of faith.” John Kerry, when talking about his support of abortion rights, said: “I believe that I can’t legislate or transfer to another American citizen my article of faith.” George W. Bush, however, stated that his faith plays an important role when he makes policy decisions: “When I make decisions, I stand on principles [referring to his religious beliefs], and the principles are derived from who I am.” The problem with what John Kerry said is that, although he may think he doesn’t force his values on others, it’s simply impossible for him not to. Everyone’s beliefs, principles, and religious views (if they have any) are necessarily a part of their decision-making. That’s what policy decisions are all about – imposing what you believe on other people (enacting laws for them to follow). There is no such thing as amoral lawmaking. Every time John Kerry casts a vote in the senate (whether it be on tax increases, raising the minimum wage, or keeping partial birth abortion legal), he imposes his values on others. The question becomes whose values will control. The two candidates last night clearly demonstrated that they have opposing values on many crucial issues. It’s important to go to the polls on November 2nd and vote for the candidate who best shares your values. Someone’s set of values will govern. Whose will it be?