For those of you unaware, there is a movie coming out tomorrow called Kinsey, based on the life of the notorious sex-research, Alfred Kinsey. This movie lauds and extols the work of this man without holding him to the fire for how exactly he conducted his research. If you take a look at his studies, it becomes apparent that, in order to get the statistics he did, he had to participate in the molestation of hundreds of children (some as young as five months old). Kinsey was a bisexual man who had an “open marriage” with his wife. He is widely credited as the “Father of the Sexual Revolution” which has done nothing positive for society and has destroyed many families in the process. I believe that the sexual revolution has particularly hurt women and children. More children live in fatherless homes because of the sexual revolution. The statistics of rape, anorexia, unwed cohabitation (which ultimately hurts women because men expect sex without making commitments to them), etc. have skyrocketed since the sexual revolution. Kinsey’s statistics (which were later proved to be extremely flawed) were used to soften and eliminate many sex crimes across America. Kinsey’s “research” has also been used to develop sex education curricula in the public schools. (Yet another reason not to put your kids in public school.) Kinsey believed that “anything goes” when it comes to sex – “If it feels good it must be right.” His research has been a disaster for the family unit in the United States. Please tell your friends about the Kinsey movie. I would urge you not to see this movie and ask your friends to boycott it as well.
In the meantime, have a happy Veterans Day! God bless and protect our troops!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
Zero Boss:
"There's nothing wrong with sexual freedom, so long as it's practiced responsibly."
I agree with your statement, as the truly responsible exercise of sexual freedom is enjoyed within the marriage relationship.
I'm curious, though, what your standard for "responsibly" is and how you determine that standard.
I don't see how it matters where the allegations of abuse came from . . . if Kinsey published material on the sexual response of children, he could have gotten his material in one of two ways:
1. He could have made it up.
2. He could have molested children or collaborated with those who did.
Either one would be enough to totally discredit him as a researcher. It's not a matter of shady allegations; it's simple logic.
Check out Kinsey, Sex and Fraud: The Indoctrination of a People by Judith A. Reisman, Edward W. Eichel, J. Gordon Muir, John H. Court, & J. H. Court - a very thorough analysis of the Kinsey Report, published in (I believe) 1990. This is the most comprehensive expose on the Kinsey Report that I am aware of, but the fact is that Kinsey's unscientific studies and deliberately manipulated statistics were discredited by objective review long before Dr. Laura rose to prominence. Perhaps just as disturbing as how he conducted his studies was how the "scientific community" contributed (and, in many circles, continues to contribute) to the myth that this was in any way a valid or reputable study. The rush to embrace his findings was nothing more than the pursuit of a blatant ideological agenda when the emperor very clearly had no clothes.
~Rose
I'm a little concerned that you feel it necessary to tell your friends to boycott a movie on Kinsey. Am I your friend? Do you have such a concern in regard to me?
Well, dude, if you DON'T want to boycott the movie, here's a thought: this is a free country.
And you don't have to read this blog, either.
Amy - I totally agree. Kinsey sounded like a scary guy.
Post a Comment